서지주요정보
Development of stress update algorithm based on finite difference method and its application to advanced constitutive models = 유한차분법 기반 응력적분법의 개발 및 고등구성방정식으로의 적용
서명 / 저자 Development of stress update algorithm based on finite difference method and its application to advanced constitutive models = 유한차분법 기반 응력적분법의 개발 및 고등구성방정식으로의 적용 / Hyun Sung Choi.
발행사항 [대전 : 한국과학기술원, 2018].
Online Access 원문보기 원문인쇄

소장정보

등록번호

8031848

소장위치/청구기호

학술문화관(문화관)B1층 보존서고

MME 18066

휴대폰 전송

도서상태

이용가능(대출불가)

사유안내

반납예정일

리뷰정보

초록정보

This study deals with stress update algorithm based on finite difference method. The developed algorithm based on multi-stage Euler backward method where the first and second derivatives of yield function are approximated by central difference method. With the developed algorithm, it is possible to conduct elastic-plastic finite element simulation without analytical first and second derivatives of yield function, which has been the biggest obstacle when advanced constitutive models such as Yld2000-2d[7], Yld2004[8], and homogeneous anisotropic hardening (HAH) model[23] are implemented for finite element modeling. For the verification purpose of the developed algorithm, single element simulation for r-value and stress directionalities prediction was conducted with Hill48 and Yld2000-2d anisotropic yield function under associated and non-associated flow rules. The simulation results were compared with the theoretical predictions and the results obtained from analytical Euler backward and Euler forward methods. To check the availability on distortional plasticity such as HAH model, single element tension followed by compression and tension (RD) followed by tension (TD) simulation were carried out and compared with the reference data. Finally, simulation for earing prediction with the developed algorithm was performed with various advanced constitutive models: Hill48 and Yld2000-2d under both associated and non-associated flow rules. The simulation results show a strong availability of the developed algorithm as an alternative to classical Euler backward method.

본 연구에서는 탄소성 유한요소해석시 필수적으로 사용되어야 하는 응력적분법을 유한차분법과 접목시켜서 개발하였다. 응력적분법에서 중요한 요소 중 하나인 항복 함수의 일계 및 이계 도함수는 재료 거동의 정확한 모사를 위해 항복 함수가 복잡해짐에 따라 해석 수렴에 큰 영향을 미쳤으며, 고등 항복 함수가 개발될 때마다 큰 이슈로 부각 되어왔다. 본 연구에서 개발된 응력적분법은 다단 Euler Backward 법을 기반으로 하며, 중앙차분법을 이용하여 항복 함수의 일계 및 이계 도함수를 성공적으로 근사하였다. 개발된 응력적분법의 수치적 검증을 위해, 단일 부하-제하 유한요소해석을 Hill48[1] 및 Yld2000-2d[7] 항복함수와 관계 및 비관계 유동 법칙을 적용하여 수행하였으며, 수행된 유한요소해석 결과의 정확성 및 시간 효율성을 Euler Forward 및 기존의 다단 Euler Backward 법을 적용한 해석결과와 비교하여 검증하였다. 또한, 항복 곡면의 뒤틀림을 통해 바우싱거 효과를 예측하는 HAH model[23]에도 개발된 응력적분법을 적용하였으며, 압연방향 "인장"-"압축" 및 "압연방향 인장"-"수직방향 재인장"시 발생하는 바우싱거 효과를 개발된 알고리즘을 통한 해석을 통해 정확하게 예측할 수 있었다. 추가적으로, 개발된 응력적분법의 복잡한 판재 성형 공정의 해석으로의 적용 가능성을 평가하기 위해 컵 드로잉 공정에서 발생하는 귀 예측 유한요소해석을 Hill48, Yld2000-2d 항복 함수, 관계 및 비관계 유동 법칙을 적용하여 수행하였다. 기존에 사용되는 다단 Euler Backward 법과 비교해 보았을 때, 본 연구에서 개발된 응력적분법을 적용한 유한요소해석 결과는 이론값과 실험값을 동일한 정확성 및 비슷한 해석 시간을 가지고 예측함을 알 수 있었다. 개발된 응력적분법이 기존 다단 Euler Backward법보다 사용자 정의 재료 서브루틴 작성이 더 효율적임을 고려하면, 개발된 응력적분법은 널리 사용되는 다단 Euler Backward를 대체할 수 있는 방법이 될 수 있을 것이다.

서지기타정보

서지기타정보
청구기호 {MME 18066
형태사항 v, 73 p. : 삽화 ; 30 cm
언어 영어
일반주기 저자명의 한글표기 : 최현성
지도교수의 영문표기 : Jeongwhan Yoon
지도교수의 한글표기 : 윤정환
학위논문 학위논문(석사) - 한국과학기술원 : 기계공학과,
서지주기 References : p. 36-38
QR CODE

책소개

전체보기

목차

전체보기

이 주제의 인기대출도서

Characteristic ofvarious kinematic hardening models

An example for effect of stress lower limits

Anisotropic coefficients ofHill48 for AA6022 T4E32

Anisotropic coefficients ofYld2000 for AA6022 T4E32

Relative error ofFirst derivative for Hill48 yield function

Relative error ofFirst derivative for Yld2000 yield function

Relative error ofsecond derivative for Hill48 yield function

Relative error ofsecond derivative for Yld2000 yield function

Wallclock time ofsingle element simulation for the three stress update algorithms.

CPU time ofsingle element simulation for the three stress update algorithms.

Wallclock time of100 element simulation for the three stress update algorithms.

CPU time of100 element simulation for the three stress update algorithms.

Anisotropic coefficients ofNon-AFR version Hill48 for AA6022 T4E32

Anisotropic coefficients ofNon-AFR version Yld2000 for AA6022 T4E32

Material properties for AA2090-T3

Wallclock simulation time for earing prediction simulation

The coefficients of original HAH model for 'Generic material

The stress and microstructure deviator based on trial stress leading the first plastic increment

The stressand microstructure deviator based on last converged stress leading the firstplastic increment

Schematic of stress-strain curve for forward-reverse loading condition

An example ofdistorted yield surface after tension followed by compression test based on HAH model

Graphical interpretations: (a) the Classical Euler Forward method and (b) the Cutting Plane method

Graphical interpretations: (a) the Classical Euler Backward method and (b) the Multi-Step integration method for Euler Backward method

Graphical interpretation ofthe Multi-Step integration method for Euler Backward method

Single element loading-unloading simulation (a) loadingstep (b) unloading step

Thepredicted r-value for Hill48 yield function from the Classical Euler Forward method

The predicted r-value for Hill48 yield function from the Euler Backward method based on analytical derivative

The predicted r-value for Hill48 yield function from the developed algorithm

The predicted r-value for Yld2000 yield function from the Classical Euler Forward method

The predicted r-value for Yld2000 yield function from the Euler Backward method based on analytical derivative

The predicted r-value for Yld2000 yield function from the developed algorithm

The predicted normalized yield stress ratio for Hill48 yield function from the Classical Euler Forward method

The predicted normalized yield stress ratio for Hill48 yield function from the Euler Backward method based on analytical derivative

The predicted normalized yield stress ratio for Hill48 yield function from the developed algorithm

The predicted normalized yield stress ratio for Yld2000yield function from the Classical Euler Forward method.

The predicted normalized yield stress ratio for Yld2000yield function from the Euler Backward method based on analytical derivative.

The predicted normalized yield stress ratio for Yld2000 yield function from the developed algorithm

100 element loading-unloading simulation

The predicted r-value from single element loading-unloading simulation with Non-AFR version Hill48

The predicted normalized yieldstress ratio from single element loading-unloading simulation with Non- AFR version Hill48

Thepredicted r-value from singleelement loading-unloading'simulation with Non-AFR version Yld2000

The predicted normalized yieldstress ratio from single element loading-unloading simulation with Non- AFR version Yld2000

Schematic view, tool dimensions, and process variables for cup drawing simulation

(a) r-value (b) Normalized yield stress ratio (c) yield and potential surface ofAA2090-T3 based on Hi1148 vield function

(a)r-value (b)Normalized yield stress ratio (c) yield and potential surface ofAA2090-T3 based on 부(현,000 vield function

A quarter ofblank mesh for cup drawing simulation

Effective plastic strain contour (Hill48 underAFR) (a) the Euler Backward method based on analytical approach (b) the developed algorithm

Effective plastic strain contour (Hill48 under Non-AFR) (a) the Euler Backward method based on analytical approach (b) the developed algorithm

Effective plastic strain contour (Y1d2000 under AFR) (a) the Euler Backward method based on analytical approach (b) the developed algorithm

Comparison ofearing for cup drawing between Euler Backward method based on analytical derivative and numerical derivative (a) Hill48 under AFR and Non-AFR (b) Yld2000 under AFR and Non-AFR

Flow chart ofUMAT based on the developed algorithm for the original HAH model.

Single element (a) tension-compression simulation and (b) tension(RD)-tension(TD) simulation

Flow chart forinitialization ofthe microstructure deviator.

Geometric interpretation ofstress update process for uniaxial tension condition (a) 1st iteration and (b) 2nd iteration

Stress-strain curve predicted by HAH model with various time increment

Stress-strain curve predicted byHAH model subjected to Tension(10%) followed by Compression(20%)

Stress-strain curve predicted by HAH model subjected to Tension(10%) followed by Orthogonal tension(20%),

Evolution ofyield surface by HAH model for Tension(10%) followed by Compression(20%).

Evolution of yield surface by HAH model associated to Tension(10%) followed by Orthogonal tension(20%).