서지주요정보
과열시기의 VaR 모델을 보완하는 스트레스 테스팅 기법에 관한 실증연구 = An empirical study on a stress testing method for VaR model in hectic days
서명 / 저자 과열시기의 VaR 모델을 보완하는 스트레스 테스팅 기법에 관한 실증연구 = An empirical study on a stress testing method for VaR model in hectic days / 차봉수.
발행사항 [대전 : 한국과학기술원, 2001].
Online Access 원문보기 원문인쇄

소장정보

등록번호

8012107

소장위치/청구기호

학술문화관(문화관) 보존서고

MGSM 01091

휴대폰 전송

도서상태

이용가능(대출불가)

사유안내

반납예정일

등록번호

9007442

소장위치/청구기호

서울 학위논문 서가

MGSM 01091 c. 2

휴대폰 전송

도서상태

이용가능(대출불가)

사유안내

반납예정일

리뷰정보

초록정보

It is widely accepted that the methods of objective risk management for financial institutions has been improved drastically. Since the advent of "RiskMetrics" by J.P. Morgan in October 1994, VaR model has been the most acknowledged tool for managing market risk. Furthermore, since being officially recognized by Basle Committee and other banking supervisory institutions, VaR model has been adopted as the most efficient method by the international financial institutions for managing their market risk. However, it is widely consented that VaR model has two major drawbacks as follows; ① VaR can`t measure the event risk under the abnormal market condition. ② VaR underestimate the risk under the Normal Distribution assumption. In this regard, VaR model should be supplemented by a regular program of stress testing. Stress Testing is required by the Basel Committee as one of prerequisite conditions to be satisfied to use internal models. It is also certified by the Derivative Policy Group and by the G-30. However, Stress Testing guidelines are not clear, and the application and use of Stress Testing are confusing, too. So, the purpose of this paper is pursuing the most acceptable Stress Test method in Korean financial market by some empirical tests through proper understanding of scenario analysis methods. Firstly, I tried to arrange some theories of Scenarios Analysis Method in Stress Testing and show the differences among them. Secondly, I implemented Stress Testing through two different methods; "Zeroed-Out" method and "Broken Arrow" method. While interpreting the result of empirical tests, I concluded that the Broken Arrow method is more convincing and reliable method than Zeroed-Out method. In addition, Predicted Stress Loss(PSL) by Broken Arrow method shows more similar results to Actual Stress Loss(ASL) comparing with Narrow Stress Loss (NSL) of Zeroed-Out method especially in hectic or abnormal market conditions. By the way, PSL by Broken Arrow method shows much more accurate estimation when ASL increased drastically, and I suggest this method be the most suitable Stress Tests method especially in hectic days.

서지기타정보

서지기타정보
청구기호 {MGSM 01091
형태사항 v, 46 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm
언어 한국어
일반주기 저자명의 영문표기 : Bong-Soo Cha
지도교수의 한글표기 : 김인준
공동교수의 한글표기 : 안창모
공동교수의 한글표기 : 이인무
지도교수의 영문표기 : In-Joon Kim
공동교수의 영문표기 : Chang-Mo Ahn
공동교수의 영문표기 : In-Moo Lee
학위논문 학위논문(석사) - 한국과학기술원 : 금융공학전공,
서지주기 참고문헌 : p. 45-46
QR CODE

책소개

전체보기

목차

전체보기

이 주제의 인기대출도서