서지주요정보
On the geometry of robustness: label smoothing and decision regions in deep neural networks = 견고성의 기하학에 대한 고찰: 라벨 스무딩과 결정 영역 심층 신경망을 중심으로
서명 / 저자 On the geometry of robustness: label smoothing and decision regions in deep neural networks = 견고성의 기하학에 대한 고찰: 라벨 스무딩과 결정 영역 심층 신경망을 중심으로 / Tair Djanibekov.
발행사항 [대전 : 한국과학기술원, 2025].
Online Access 원문보기 원문인쇄

소장정보

등록번호

8044948

소장위치/청구기호

학술문화관(도서관)2층 학위논문

MAI 25082

휴대폰 전송

도서상태

이용가능(대출불가)

사유안내

반납예정일

리뷰정보

초록정보

The robustness of neural network-based deep learning models against adversarial attacks is closely related to the geometric structure of their decision boundaries. Prior empirical studies have revealed that networks exhibiting fragmented decision boundaries, that are quantified by a high proportion of the Populated Region Set (PRS), are particularly vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Consequently, geometric regularization methods based on the PRS concept have been proposed. However, these methods have limitations in scenarios where the geometric structure of the decision boundary is insufficiently developed, such as during early training phases or when using large batch sizes. In this thesis, I first provide a theoretical analysis that mathematically validates how training configurations, including batch size, and regularization techniques such as label smoothing influence the geometric structure of the decision boundaries. Based on this theoretical insight, I propose a novel regularization technique, named PRS-aware Label Smoothing (PaLS), that integrates the concept of label smoothing with the PRS framework to overcome the limitations of existing PRS-based regularization methods. PaLS encourages alignment between the key centroids of decision regions and feature embeddings through smoothing techniques, thereby addressing the issue of fragmented decision boundaries and enhancing adversarial robustness. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, experiments were conducted across three different models. Experimental results demonstrate that PaLS provides superior robustness compared to standard label smoothing and existing PRS-based regularization methods across various architectures and training scenarios. In conclusion, this study deepens the geometric understanding of deep learning models and offers a practical approach to improving robustness against adversarial attacks.

신경망 기반딥러닝 모델의적대적공격에 대한강건성은모델결정영역의기하학적구조와밀접한 관련이있다. 이전의경험적연구들은결정영역이파편화된네트워크일수록 Populated Region Set(PRS) 의비율이높고, 이로 인해적대적공격에 취약하다는 것을밝혀냈다. 따라서PRS 개념에 기반한기하학적 정규화기법들이제안되었으나, 훈련 초기이거나 배치 크기가클 때처럼 결정영역의기하학적구조가충분 히 형성되지않은상황에서는 이방법론들을적용하는 데한계가있다. 본논문에서는 먼저이론적분석을 통해배치 크기와같은학습방식의차이와라벨스무딩(label smoothing) 기법과같은정규화방법이결정 영역의기하학적구조에 미치는 영향을수학적으로 검증한다. 이를 바탕으로 기존PRS 기반정규화기법의 한계를 극복하고자라벨스무딩을PRS 개념과결합한새로운정규화기법인PRS-aware Label Smoothing (PaLS)를 제안한다. PaLS는 결정영역의주요중심점과특징임베딩을스무딩 기법을통해정렬하도록 유도하여, 결정영역의파편화문제를 해결하고적대적강건성을향상시킨다. 제안한기법의유효성을검증 하기 위해세가지모델에 적용하여 실험을수행하였다. 실험결과PaLS는 표준라벨스무딩 및기존PRS 기반정규화방법에 비해다양한아키텍쳐 및훈련 시나리오에서더높은강건성을보였다. 결론적으로, 본 연구는 딥러닝 모델의기하학적이해를 심화하고, 적대적공격에 대한강건성을향상시키기 위한실용적인 접근법을제시한다.

서지기타정보

서지기타정보
청구기호 {MAI 25082
형태사항 iii, 20 p. : 삽화 ; 30 cm
언어 영어
일반주기 저자명의 한글표기: 타이르 자니베코프
지도교수의 영문표기: Jae Sik Choi
지도교수의 한글표기: 최재식
학위논문 학위논문(석사) - 한국과학기술원 : 김재철AI대학원,
서지주기 References: p. 19-20
주제 Adversarial Robustness
Label Smoothing
Decision Region
Robust Training
적대적강건성
라벨스무딩
결정영역
강건학습
QR CODE

책소개

전체보기

목차

전체보기

이 주제의 인기대출도서

Visualization of internal decision boundaries (DBs), decision regions (DRs), and populated regions (PRs) in a two-dimensional input space. (a) Internal DBs defined by neuron activation boundaries. (b) Intersection of DBs forming populated regions occupied by data samples.

Conceptual comparison of PRS between two neural networks trained on dataset X. Network A demonstrates fragmented decision regions resulting in a high PRS ratio, indicative of lower robustness, while Network B showcases fewer, larger decision regions, corresponding to a low PRS ratio and thus greater robustness. Gray dots represent data points.

PRS ratio and accuracy for CNN-6 trained on CIFAR-10 with batch sizes 128 vs. 2048, with/without label smoothing (LS). Without LS, small-batch training causes rapid PRS collapse, unlike large-batch training, which sustains a higher PRS consistent with sharp minima. With LS, PRS collapses faster (small-batch) and oscillates (large-batch), reflecting LS’s nuanced geometric impact.

Architecture of CNN-6. All convolutional and fully-connected layers use RELU unless otherwise. Kernel size \(k=3\), padding \(p=1\), and stride \(s=1\) for every convolution; each MaxPool22, \(s=2\). CIFAR-10 input size of \(32 \times 32\) is assumed.

Distribution of decision regions (DR) and major regions (MR) for VGG-16 trained on CIFAR-10, comparing standard training, adversarial training (AT), PRS regularizer (Park et al.), and our proposed PaLS regularizer. PaLS significantly reduces decision-region fragmentation and increases the proportion of samples within major regions.

Robust accuracy, clean accuracy (Test), and PRS ratio (%) under PGD-20 \(L_{\infty}\) attacksCIFAR-10 for different regularization methods. The best results in each category are highlighted in bc